Talk:Glossary: Difference between revisions

Add topic
From sona pona, the Toki Pona wiki
Latest comment: 1 year ago by JPeton
Content added Content deleted
(Created page with "I'm just ploughing ahead with these grammar terms, despite the fact that they are very much an active subject of contention. I think it's important that the wiki maintain consistent terminology across its articles discussing grammar, but I'm less certain of what that terminology should be. ~~~~")
 
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I'm just ploughing ahead with these grammar terms, despite the fact that they are very much an active subject of contention. I think it's important that the wiki maintain consistent terminology across its articles discussing grammar, but I'm less certain of what that terminology should be. [[User:JPeton|JPeton]] ([[User talk:JPeton|talk]]) 18:01, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
I'm just ploughing ahead with these grammar terms, despite the fact that they are very much an active subject of contention. I think it's important that the wiki maintain consistent terminology across its articles discussing grammar, but I'm less certain of what that terminology should be. [[User:JPeton|JPeton]] ([[User talk:JPeton|talk]]) 18:01, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

:At this point I went digging for sources and I wanted to pull out Andre Martinet and De Saussure, but those are from a very particular school of linguistics that not everybody subscribes to. While I want to avoid over commiting myself, it is helpful for me to have this glossary here as I work on the articles. Again, peer review is necessary. [[User:JPeton|JPeton]] ([[User talk:JPeton|talk]]) 05:23, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

The other problem is that of referencing these entries. I would love it if we could define key words that automatically get linked to their entries, so that every appearance of "optative" automatically is a hyperlink to the glossary. In org mode they're called "radio links", but I don't know whether there's a mediawiki equivalent. [[User:JPeton|JPeton]] ([[User talk:JPeton|talk]]) 05:25, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:25, 24 February 2023

I'm just ploughing ahead with these grammar terms, despite the fact that they are very much an active subject of contention. I think it's important that the wiki maintain consistent terminology across its articles discussing grammar, but I'm less certain of what that terminology should be. JPeton (talk) 18:01, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

At this point I went digging for sources and I wanted to pull out Andre Martinet and De Saussure, but those are from a very particular school of linguistics that not everybody subscribes to. While I want to avoid over commiting myself, it is helpful for me to have this glossary here as I work on the articles. Again, peer review is necessary. JPeton (talk) 05:23, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The other problem is that of referencing these entries. I would love it if we could define key words that automatically get linked to their entries, so that every appearance of "optative" automatically is a hyperlink to the glossary. In org mode they're called "radio links", but I don't know whether there's a mediawiki equivalent. JPeton (talk) 05:25, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]