211
edits
Talk:kepeken e: Difference between revisions
→"kepeken e" is uncommon?: Reply
Citrons.xyz (talk | contribs) (I think "kepeken e" is valid.) |
(→"kepeken e" is uncommon?: Reply) |
||
Line 31:
the article itself cites a source which still teaches the construction. I would hardly call it confusing or obscure. [[User:Citrons.xyz|Citrons.xyz]] ([[User talk:Citrons.xyz|talk]]) 19:15, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
:I agree. I’ve always used kepeken e, and when reading this talk page I was flabbergasted by how rare people say it is used. [[User:Enky|Enky]] ([[User talk:Enky|talk]]) 20:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
| |||