pi: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m This feels like unsubstantiated opinion.
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Visual edit
Rewrite pi is not possessive.
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Visual edit
Line 55: Line 55:


=== Possession ===
=== Possession ===
{{tp|pi}} is not a possessive particle. It does not necessarily indicate ownership or translate the English "'s" ending. Any adjective can be interpreted as indicating possession regardless of the presence or absence of {{tp|pi}}. {{tp|pi}} serves the same purpose in a possessive context as it does in any other: to separate a group of modifiers from those preceding them.
A related misconception is that {{tp|pi}} marks possession. In reality, adjectives can be interpreted as possessive with or without {{tp|pi}}. It is just about whether the possessor is referred to with more than one word.

{{Example|tomo ona|their house}}
{{Example|tomo ona|their house}}

{{Example|tomo pi ona ale|all of theirs' house|tomo pi(ona ale)}}
In this case, the word {{tp|ona}} could name the owner of the house.
{{Example|tomo pi ona wan|one of them's house|tomo pi(ona wan)}}

{{Example|tomo pi jan Tanja|jan Tanja's house|tomo pi(jan Tanja)}}

Here, jan Tanja owns the house; {{tp|pi}} is used to separate the phrase {{tp|jan Tanja}} from the word {{tp|tomo}}, preventing confusion:

{{Example|tomo ona ale|all their houses}}
{{Example|tomo pi ona ale|all-of-them house; house belonging to all of them|tomo pi(ona ale)}}

Possession is one of many possible interpretations of {{tp|pi}}: what comes after {{tp|pi}} simply modifies, describes, qualifies, or alters what comes before it.


== Controversy ==
== Controversy ==