sona pona:lipu pona/en: Difference between revisions

From sona pona, the Toki Pona wiki
Content deleted Content added
Updating to match new version of source page
 
Updating to match new version of source page
Line 1:
{{tp title}}
[[File:Symbol support vote.svg|right|20x20px]]
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
'''{{tp|lipu pona}}''' (good article) is a label of recognition for thorough, well-written articles. An ''article'' is a content page in the main namespace, so [[Special:ListRedirects|redirects]] and userspace [[:Category:Essays|essays]] do not qualify. The main page features a blurb from a random {{tp|lipu pona}}.
</div>
 
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
==Criteria==
These criteria are based in part on Wikipedia's {{wp|Project:Good article criteria|good article criteria}}.
</div>
 
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
# '''Completeness''': The article is complete within reason. It covers all relevant topics. It has a reasonable level of detail. No maintenance templates are applicable or used.
# '''Writing''': The article is well-written in standard English. It is reasonably focused and understandable. It is helpful in explaining the topic to learners.
Line 17 ⟶ 12:
# '''Accuracy''': The article reflects community consensus. Descriptions of specific styles of Toki Pona use the appropriate template.
# '''Illustration''': The article uses media where feasible. Media thumbnails are captioned.
</div>
 
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
==List==
The following articles have been assessed to be {{tp|lipu pona}}.
</div>
{{#categorytree:lipu pona|namespaces=-<!--Main-->}}
[[Category:lipu pona| ]]

Revision as of 22:35, 17 December 2023

lipu pona (good article) is a label of recognition for thorough, well-written articles. An article is a content page in the main namespace, so redirects and userspace essays do not qualify. The main page features a blurb from a random lipu pona.

Criteria

These criteria are based in part on Wikipedia's good article criteria.

  1. Completeness: The article is complete within reason. It covers all relevant topics. It has a reasonable level of detail. No maintenance templates are applicable or used.
  2. Writing: The article is well-written in standard English. It is reasonably focused and understandable. It is helpful in explaining the topic to learners.
  3. Formatting: The layout and formatting of a standard wiki article are used. Markup and templates are used according to the formatting guide. The article follows web accessibility guidelines.
  4. Attribution: The article uses any applicable copyright template. Sources are cited, or attributed by linking to an article on the source (for example, descriptions of Toki Pona: The Language of Good can link to its article, although a citation with page numbers is preferred).
  5. Accuracy: The article reflects community consensus. Descriptions of specific styles of Toki Pona use the appropriate template.
  6. Illustration: The article uses media where feasible. Media thumbnails are captioned.

List

The following articles have been assessed to be lipu pona.