sona pona talk:Guide: Difference between revisions

(→‎“Be messy”: new section)
 
Line 9:
 
imo we need complete meaningful articles, not one-sentence stubs. after all this can give a wrong impression about this wiki. plus that also highly decreases the wiki’s depth. [[User:Enky|Enky]] ([[User talk:Enky|talk]]) 19:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 
:it would be fine if sona pona was a larger wiki, but it isn’t. a lot of articles are created, and then forgotten about. as of the date this message was posted, there were 145 pages in [[:Category:Stubs|category:stubs]] and 653 in total. thus one in every 4.5 (!) pages is a stub. most of those stubs are articles, whose scope are actually important things. yet instead of helping to expand them, we’re creating articles about obscure words mentioned once or twice. i’m sorry if i’m phrasing this rudely, that wasn’t my intention. i often try to help with expanding significant articles, but not many people do the same as me. in fact, looking at [[Special:RecentChanges|special:recent changes]], almost every entry is from a very different article. and most of those articles are those that have already been big and well-written before!
:<small>also by what criteria is [[jan Kekan San]] considered a stub????</small> [[User:Enky|Enky]] ([[User talk:Enky|talk]]) 20:05, 8 June 2024 (UTC)