7,937
edits
Jan Ke Tami (talk | contribs) m (Jan Ke Tami moved page preverb marking to Preverb marking: capitalisation fix) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1:
{{Nonstandard}}
'''Preverb marking''' is an experimental {{tp|nasin}} for
For
<blockquote>
Only one ''ta'' or ''ni'' is necessary in a sentence, and repeating it is redundant. Similarly to ''mi'' and ''sina'' for ''[[li]]'', the "canonical" lexical class of preverbs (''alasa'', ''awen'', ''ken'', ''kama'', ''lukin/oko'', ''sona'', and ''wile'') do not need ''ta'' or ''ni'' to be interpreted as preverbs.▼
{{tok|mi utala ta toki e ni.}} → {{tok|mi utala e ni: mi toki e ni.}} → ''I resist saying that.''
</blockquote>
For <em>intransitive words</em> (such as {{tp|ken}}, where the object is made to be or do the predicate), the preverb phrase affects the main predicate by specifying the preverb word:
<blockquote>
{{tok|jan mute li nasin ni tawa tomo pali.}} → {{tok|jan mute li nasin ni: [jan mute li] tawa tomo pali.}} → ''Many people have a habit/duty of going to work.''
</blockquote>
Similarly to traditional preverbs, the order of words in a preverb phrase can greatly impact the meaning of the final message by changing the ordering of levels. Additionally, {{tp|ala}} retains its usage of negating preverbs in a preverb phrase.
▲Only one
|