Preverb marking: Difference between revisions

122 bytes added ,  9 months ago
no edit summary
m (Jan Ke Tami moved page preverb marking to Preverb marking: capitalisation fix)
No edit summary
Line 1:
{{Nonstandard}}
 
'''Preverb marking''' is an experimental {{tp|nasin}} for ''{{tp|[[toki pona]]''}} that allows speakers to explicitly separate the [[Preverb|preverbs]] of a sentence from the main [[predicate]], often using a {{tp|nimisin}}. This makes preverbs a grammatical position rather than a lexical class, allowing for the usage of all [[Content words|content wordsword]]s as descriptors for a main state or process.
 
''{{tp|ta''}} and ''{{tp|ni''}} are established options for a preverb-marking particle in ''toki pona''. Both work the same in practice, but one might be preferred to another in a given ''{{tp|nasin''}} based off of disambiguation or intuitiveness. Similarly to ''{{tp|[[e]]''}}, ''ta''the andmeaning ''ni''resulting varyfrom inuse theirof meaning{{tp|ta}} and {{tp|ni}} varies depending on the type of word included in the preverb phrase.
 
For ''<em>transitive words''</em> (such as ''{{tp|alasa''}}, where the object is the ''<em>patient''</em> of the predicate), preverb phrases affect the main predicate by treating a preverb as a layer over the main predicate:<blockquote>mi utala ta toki e ni. → mi utala e ni: mi toki e ni. → ''I resist saying that.''</blockquote>For ''intransitive words'' (such as ''ken'', where the object is made to be or do the predicate), the preverb phrase affects the main predicate by specifying the preverb word:<blockquote>jan mute li nasin ni tawa tomo pali. → jan mute li nasin ni: [jan mute li] tawa tomo pali. → ''Many people have a habit/duty of going to work.''</blockquote>Similarly to traditional preverbs, the order of words in a preverb phrase can greatly impact the meaning of the final message by changing the ordering of levels. Additionally, ''ala'' retains its usage of negating preverbs in a preverb phrase.
 
<blockquote>
Only one ''ta'' or ''ni'' is necessary in a sentence, and repeating it is redundant. Similarly to ''mi'' and ''sina'' for ''[[li]]'', the "canonical" lexical class of preverbs (''alasa'', ''awen'', ''ken'', ''kama'', ''lukin/oko'', ''sona'', and ''wile'') do not need ''ta'' or ''ni'' to be interpreted as preverbs.
{{tok|mi utala ta toki e ni.}} → {{tok|mi utala e ni: mi toki e ni.}} → ''I resist saying that.''
</blockquote>
 
For <em>intransitive words</em> (such as {{tp|ken}}, where the object is made to be or do the predicate), the preverb phrase affects the main predicate by specifying the preverb word:
 
<blockquote>
{{tok|jan mute li nasin ni tawa tomo pali.}} → {{tok|jan mute li nasin ni: [jan mute li] tawa tomo pali.}} → ''Many people have a habit/duty of going to work.''
</blockquote>
 
Similarly to traditional preverbs, the order of words in a preverb phrase can greatly impact the meaning of the final message by changing the ordering of levels. Additionally, {{tp|ala}} retains its usage of negating preverbs in a preverb phrase.
 
Only one ''{{tp|ta''}} or ''{{tp|ni''}} is necessary in a sentence, and repeating it is redundant. Similarly to ''{{tp|mi''}} and ''{{tp|sina''}} for ''{{tp|[[li]]''}}, the "canonical" lexical class of preverbs (''{{tp|alasa'', ''awen'', ''ken'', ''kama'', ''lukin/oko'', ''sona'', and ''wile''}}) do not need ''{{tp|ta''}} or ''{{tp|ni''}} to be interpreted as preverbs.