Jump to content

sona pona:lipu pona/en: Difference between revisions

Updating to match new version of source page
(Updating to match new version of source page)
(Updating to match new version of source page)
Line 1:
{{tp title|lipu pona}}
<languages />
[[File:Symbol support vote.svg|right|20x20px]]
Line 7:
These criteria are based in part on Wikipedia's {{wp|Project:Good article criteria|good article criteria}}.
 
# '''Completeness''': The article is complete within reason. It covers all relevant topics. It has a reasonable level of detail. No [[Project:Guide#Maintenance templates|maintenance templates]] are applicable or used.
# '''Writing''': The article is well-written in standard Englishlanguage. It is reasonably focused and understandable. It is helpful in explaining the topic to learners.
# '''Formatting''': The layout and formatting of a standard wiki article are used. Markup and templates are used [[Project:Guide#Formatting|according to the formatting guide]]. The article follows web accessibility guidelines.
# '''Attribution''': The article uses any applicable copyright template. Sources are cited, or attributed by linking to an article on the source (for example, descriptions of ''Toki Pona: The Language of Good'' can link to [[Toki Pona: The Language of Good|its article]], although a [[Template:cite pu|citation with page numbers]] is preferred).
Line 17:
The following articles have been assessed to be {{tp|lipu pona}}.
{{#categorytree:lipu pona|namespaces=-<!--Main-->}}
 
==Candidates==
{{lipu pona candidates}}
[[Category:lipu pona| ]]
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.