8,101
edits
Talk:Historical usage: Difference between revisions
→page name: Reply
No edit summary |
(→page name: Reply) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 10:
I think it’s better if we rename the page to ''obsolete usage''. In my opinion, it reflects the page better and explicitly states that it’s not used anymore. Perhaps we can even rename it to ''obsolete early usage''? [[User:Enky|Enky]] ([[User talk:Enky|talk]]) 13:45, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
:The similar page [[Archaic words]] also exists. Presumably the two should have a similar name: Archaic usage and archaic words? Obsolete usage and obsolete words? Deprecated? [[User:JPeton|JPeton]] ([[User talk:JPeton|talk]]) 15:57, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
::I agree. In my opinion “Archaic usage” is even better than what I originally suggested. [[User:Enky|Enky]] ([[User talk:Enky|talk]]) 17:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
::Technically, "archaic" means that it's still used, but to evoke an old-fashioned effect. Not exactly sure where the line would be between "out of fashion" and "archaic" and "obsolete" (no longer understood) in Toki Pona. [[User:Menasewi|Menasewi]] ([[User talk:Menasewi|talk]]) 19:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
== To-do ==
{{Talk}}
you can basically see Kipo's style of speech to see what to add
* expand the existing sections
* particle {{tp|o}}
* sourcing and such
[[User:SnpoSuwan|jan Juwan]] ([[User talk:SnpoSuwan|talk]]) 00:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
| |||