Talk:kepeken: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 7 months ago by JPeton
Content added Content deleted
Jan Ke Tami (talk | contribs) (Reply) |
(Reply) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Hm, maybe [[kepeken e]] is not named very well, but I like having a page that's separate from [[kepeken]] to talk about the discussion about transitive kepeken at length. |
:Hm, maybe [[kepeken e]] is not named very well, but I like having a page that's separate from [[kepeken]] to talk about the discussion about transitive kepeken at length. |
||
:Yeah, I think renaming [[kepeken e]] might be good. [[User:Jan Ke Tami|Jan Ke Tami]] ([[User talk:Jan Ke Tami|talk]]) 23:33, 10 November 2023 (UTC) |
:Yeah, I think renaming [[kepeken e]] might be good. [[User:Jan Ke Tami|Jan Ke Tami]] ([[User talk:Jan Ke Tami|talk]]) 23:33, 10 November 2023 (UTC) |
||
::Agreed. [[User:JPeton|JPeton]] ([[User talk:JPeton|talk]]) 01:26, 11 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:26, 11 November 2023
Potentially this should be merged with kepeken e, but that's a whole fight I don't have the spoons for right now. The history of the various forms is definitely beyond me, since the discourse is frequently (and I take my share of the blame here) acrid and aggressive. JPeton (talk) 21:21, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hm, maybe kepeken e is not named very well, but I like having a page that's separate from kepeken to talk about the discussion about transitive kepeken at length.
- Yeah, I think renaming kepeken e might be good. Jan Ke Tami (talk) 23:33, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed. JPeton (talk) 01:26, 11 November 2023 (UTC)