3,447
edits
Talk:li: Difference between revisions
→mi li: Reply
Jan Ke Tami (talk | contribs) (→mi li: Reply) |
(→mi li: Reply) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2:
[https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Updated_jan_Pije%27s_lessons/Lesson_3_Basic_Sentences jan Pije's "li" lesson]
--[[User:JPeton|JPeton]] ([[User talk:JPeton|talk]]) 19:20, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
:Added. [[User:JPeton|JPeton]] ([[User talk:JPeton|talk]]) 16:44, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
== Normative/descriptive wording ==
Perhaps "a downside of this method" is a slightly biased wording — many either don't see an ambiguity or don't see a problem with it. Perhaps "this sort of sentence is potentially ambiguous, since the word could either be a modifier or a predicate." [[User:JPeton|JPeton]] ([[User talk:JPeton|talk]]) 04:44, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
:Fixed. [[User:JPeton|JPeton]] ([[User talk:JPeton|talk]]) 16:40, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
== sitelen pona examples ==
Line 21 ⟶ 25:
:Done: [[mi li and sina li]]. [[User:Jan Ke Tami|Jan Ke Tami]] ([[User talk:Jan Ke Tami|talk]]) 14:08, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
::I've tried to merge back into this article what I could from [[mi li and sina li]], though there are a few interesting points made there that I didn't bring back. Perhaps this should be discussed in a context of "proposed reforms"? Maybe there's a good place to consolidate all these potential beginner mistakes? [[User:JPeton|JPeton]] ([[User talk:JPeton|talk]]) 16:44, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
:::for a proposed reform, mi li and sina li would indeed be a good place for it. [[User:SnpoSuwan|SnpoSuwan]] ([[User talk:SnpoSuwan|talk]]) 19:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
== Misconceptions ==
I generally am not a fan of these sections, and unless somebody has a use for it besides pointing out a mistake in the first series of Misali videos, I propose that it be removed from the article. [[User:JPeton|JPeton]] ([[User talk:JPeton|talk]]) 16:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
| |||