Talk:poka: Difference between revisions
Add topicLatest comment: 4 months ago by SnpoSuwan in topic Origin of historical poka preposition
Content added Content deleted
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:It's not clear. The archives I have only record Pije's use of it, but that doesn't mean there was never a period where Sonja used it that way, just that I don't have the evidence here and now. It's worth pointing out Sonja's current disavowal of the nasin, though. [[User:JPeton|JPeton]] ([[User talk:JPeton|talk]]) 11:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC) |
:It's not clear. The archives I have only record Pije's use of it, but that doesn't mean there was never a period where Sonja used it that way, just that I don't have the evidence here and now. It's worth pointing out Sonja's current disavowal of the nasin, though. [[User:JPeton|JPeton]] ([[User talk:JPeton|talk]]) 11:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC) |
||
::Jonathan Gabel has talked about this [https://jonathangabel.com/2020/historical-experimental-directions/ on his website]. btw, according to [https://github.com/stefichjo/toki-pona/blob/master/kipo.md jan Tepan here], it is also a Kipo-ism. [[User:SnpoSuwan|jan Juwan]] ([[User talk:SnpoSuwan|talk]]) 13:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 13:26, 6 February 2024
Origin of historical poka preposition[edit | edit source]
Pije might be the one who originated this nasin? "who claimed it was a preposition in the past? i never used or taught it that way. maybe it was a Pijeism?" Sonja on Discord Jan Ke Tami (talk) 10:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- It's not clear. The archives I have only record Pije's use of it, but that doesn't mean there was never a period where Sonja used it that way, just that I don't have the evidence here and now. It's worth pointing out Sonja's current disavowal of the nasin, though. JPeton (talk) 11:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Jonathan Gabel has talked about this on his website. btw, according to jan Tepan here, it is also a Kipo-ism. jan Juwan (talk) 13:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC)