Unicode: Difference between revisions

127 bytes removed ,  10 days ago
→‎Concerns: per jan Lepeka: "Unicode hates gaps; they know what you're trying to pull when you do that"
mNo edit summary
(→‎Concerns: per jan Lepeka: "Unicode hates gaps; they know what you're trying to pull when you do that")
Tag: 2017 source edit
 
Line 35:
(And as for which {{tok|nimi sin}} to add to the Extended block, I think for the time being we could add any word that any fontmaker wants to support in their font. Once SP font making becomes more common, perhaps when 2 or 3 font makers promise to add it to a font, or something like that.)
</blockquote></ref> This would come at the expense of complicating the encoding situation rather than submitting one proposal and being done with it.
*'''Commerciality'''. While the [[Toki Pona logo|Toki Pona "logo"]] {{sp|toki-pona}} would not receive its own codepoint, it occurs as part of {{tp|sitelen pona}} {{sp|[[pu]]}}. Moreover, {{sp|pu}} and {{sp|[[ku]]}} refer to and graphically represent commercial products that are not fully in the public domain. If this is an issue, an idea is to reserve the codepoints for these glyphs, not officially defining them, but allowing ''de facto'' use. Otherwise, fonts would have to create workarounds to encode them, which may create another standardization problem.
 
==References==