7,937
edits
Wikipedia: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 26:
On 30 May 2007, the article was nominated for deletion for the second time. Discussion ended on 6 June, with consensus being to delete the article.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Toki_Pona_(2nd_nomination)|title=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toki Pona (2nd nomination)|website=English Wikipedia|access-date=2023-12-28}}</ref> However, on 9 July, this decision was discussed in a deletion review. On 14 July, the deletion was overturned "in light of new information" discussed.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_July_9|title=Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 July 9|website=English Wikipedia|access-date=2023-12-28}}</ref> On 25 July, the deleted article moved back to mainspace.
====
On 3 September 2008, the Toki Pona article on Wikipedia was nominated for a Language and literature good article for the first time. The review seems to be quite a weak one, considering Wikipedia's reviewing guidelines are already in existence.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_criteria&oldid=228989565</ref> The review simply reads:<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Toki_Pona/GA1</ref>
<blockquote>
I believe that this article is worthy of Good Article status. It's [''{{w|sic}}''] prose is excellent, and goes into depth about its subject. Certain sections of the article could be expanded slightly, but it has done enough to recieve [''sic''] good article status.
</blockquote>
On 13 March 2010, it was requested to check whether the good article (GA) status of the Toki Pona article needed reassessment. The reviewer criticized many unreferenced sections, inconsistent citation formatting, overreliance on primary sources and personal websites, and excessive detail. The assessment was placed on hold to give contributors a chance to improve the article. The only reply was by a self-described major contributor to the article, who said "it doesn't feel particularly GA to me. More fun than encyclopedic".<ref name=":12">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Toki_Pona/GA2</ref><ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sonjaaa&oldid=371038617#GA_reassessment_of_Toki_Pona</ref> On 20 March, the article was delisted from "Language and literature good articles".<ref name=":12" />
Line 34 ⟶ 39:
On 15 March 2013, the Toki Pona article on Wikipedia was nominated for deletion for the fourth time.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Toki_Pona_(4th_nomination)|title=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toki Pona (4th nomination)|website=English Wikipedia|access-date=2023-12-28}}</ref><ref name="wikipedia-deletion-forums">{{cite web|url=http://forums.tokipona.org/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=2203|title=toki pona article on wikipedia up for deletion|website=Toki Pona Forums|name={{tok|jan Mato}}|username=janMato|date=2013-03-16|access-date=2023-12-28}}</ref> Discussion ended on 23 March; consensus was to keep the article.
====Increased viewership and
On 23 March 2018, the article reached a peak in viewership<ref>https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&start=2018-02-24&end=2018-04-24&pages=Toki_Pona Before the video usually about 200 people visited the page every day. On the day of the publication it is 650, the next day the number reaches as high as 1819, and the two following days, 997 and 633, respectively.</ref> after the YouTube channel Langfocus published a video on Toki Pona.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4y7tf3VJAM</ref>
On 8 January 2019, the article on Wikipedia was nominated as a language and literature good article for the second time.<ref name=":16">https://tinyurl.com/y2qy24pk</ref> The nomination process continued throughout most of the year. As of 3 September, the reviewer of the good article nomination was not responding,<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Toki_Pona/GA3</ref><ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:IJzeren_Jan#Talk:Toki_Pona/GA3</ref><ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_nominations&diff=908513028&oldid=908492735</ref> so another reviewer took his place.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_nominations&diff=913905283&oldid=9138964</ref> Later on 30 September, the page passed good article criteria, becoming a language and literature good article.<ref name=":16" /><ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Toki_Pona&diff=918875037&oldid=913905169</ref><ref name=":18">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Toki_Pona/GA4</ref> After this, the former reviewer appeared with additional comments.<ref name=":18" />
On 4 October 2019, some facts from the Toki Pona article on Wikipedia were nominated to appear in the "Did you know …" column on the Wikipedia main page.<ref name=":19">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Toki_Pona</ref> As of 13 October, an editor had indicated willingness to review the nomination.<ref name=":19" /><ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Toki_Pona&diff=921067761&oldid=919691978</ref>
<blockquote>
Did you know ... that Toki Pona, a constructed language devised in 2001, uses only around 120 to 125 root words?
| |||