sona pona:Notability: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
(Start draft, added notability standard and strategies to talk about sitelen pona glyphs)
Line 10: Line 10:
* A list may warrant its own article, even if not all of its items do, and even if the list does not form a coherent style of Toki Pona usage.
* A list may warrant its own article, even if not all of its items do, and even if the list does not form a coherent style of Toki Pona usage.
* [[mw:Help:User page|User pages]] are not subject to notability requirements.
* [[mw:Help:User page|User pages]] are not subject to notability requirements.

==Word articles==
{{Main|Project:Word articles|sona pona:Word articles}}
{{Needs work||section}}

==={{tp|sitelen pona}}===
There is little data on the usage of {{tp|sitelen pona}} glyphs in the community. Editors should not give undue weight to glyphs, particularly those created by fontmakers or other creators for {{wikt|completionism|completionist}} purposes, but which otherwise have no other notable usage.

In this case, these glyphs may still be included, but they should not show up in the infobox and should not be stated outright to be "the" glyph for a certain word. Below is a example suggestion for phrasing its section.

<pre>
A proposed {{tp|[[sitelen pona]]}} glyph for word is ... in order that it could be used in the writing system In practice, it is unknown whether the glyph sees significant use.
</pre>

Another example for a [[historical]] word:

<pre>
The word predated {{tp|[[sitelen pona]]}}; a glyph was later proposed in order that it could be used in the writing system. The proposed glyph is ... In practice, it is unknown whether the glyph sees significant use.
</pre>
{{Project}}
{{Project}}