3,601
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1:
[[Toki Pona]]'s simplicity is often described as '''minimalism''', including in official material. This makes some learners sensitive to perceived inefficiencies, like the color and animal words that could be replaced by other words and phrases. However, Toki Pona is
== Problems with minimalism ==
Toki Pona tries to be natural and focus on universals of the human experience, whereas conlangs that are engineered for minimalism often feel unnatural to use. Natural languages develop basic color words for light, dark, red, yellow, and
Redundancy is a failsafe, and such "inefficiency" can be a strength in language.<ref>K. Klein (26 August 2022).
Replacing words with set phrases would also be a form of [[lexicalization]]. For example, replacing the word {{tp|jelo}} with {{tp|kule suno}} (as suggested by the {{tp|[[sitelen pona]]}} glyph {{
==
As the name suggests, Toki Pona is built around the concept of {{tp|[[pona]]}}. It is only simple to the extent that its simplicity is {{tp|pona}}. The separate animal words encourage discussing different kinds of animals, which can be therapeutic. Similarly, the word {{tp|[[mu]]}} exists apart from {{tp|kalama soweli}} because using an onomatopoeia is joyful.
The philosophy of Toki Pona's simplicity is discussed in {{pu|en}}. Simplifying complicated ideas provides new insights and "points to the centre of things
The language's simplicity aims for a happy medium where things are not overcomplicated, but not too limited for speech, understanding, or fun.
==
<references />
{{General}}
|