Jump to content

li: Difference between revisions

753 bytes added ,  7 months ago
no edit summary
m (Rephrase opinionated description of extended li.)
No edit summary
Line 49:
 
==={{tp|li}} is not "is"===
InMany hislearners serieshave the misconception that {{tp|li}} translates to "is", "are", or "to be". Notably, {{tok|[[jan Misali]]}}'s ''[[12 Days of sona pi toki pona|12 Days of {{tok|sona pi toki pona}}]]'', {{tok|[[janmakes Misali]]}}this introduces the word {{tp|li}} as meaning "is".claim<ref>{{cite YouTube|id=KTbnGX6G_P4|title=12 Days of {{tok|sona pi toki pona}} Day Two: Sentence Structure|name={{tok|jan Misali}}|date=14 December 2015|channel=jan Misali|handle=HMaster|HBMmaster}}</ref> This(which has since beenis corrected in his newer series ''toki pona lessons'').
 
The word "is" is a verb, whereas {{tp|li}} is not a verb. It is a particle that <em>introduces</em> a verb, regardless of whether the sentence would be translated with "is".
 
Take the following example:
{{Example|mi pona.|I (›) am good.}}
{{Example|ona li pona.|They › are good.}}
{{Example|ona li pona e ijo.|They › improve » something.}}
It is more consistent to say that "to be good" and "improve" are both translations of {{tp|pona}}. This pattern is true of all [[content word]]s.
 
This is also why {{tp|li}} cannot be used in a [[pi phrase|{{tp|pi}} phrase]]. {{tp|li}} is a particle that has higher priority than {{tp|pi}}, not a content word that could be used within a {{tp|pi}} phrase.
 
==References==
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.