Discuss plorcly borglar

tp wiki formatting

It's not really in toki pona, so I'm not sure if the tp template should apply in general for plocly borglar stuff - and more importantly I have the impression the title shouldn't be indicated as tok either? Jan Ke Tami (talk) 23:52, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Seems closer to being in Toki Pona than in English, which is what it would fall back to otherwise.

A third option could be to invent a subcode like tok-plorcly, but it's not like Pig Latin is tagged as a separate language from English. And then more subcodes would have to be standardized for everything under Writing systems, and probably several other obfuscations of Toki Pona. (…Maybe tok-sp would be good for UCSUR sitelen pona, but that's another discussion.) Menasewi (talk) 18:15, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

<musi>

iso script tags are a) always 4-letter b) very lacking in the private use department (only Qaaa-Qabx)

so since there's no sp code it'd have to be either

- tok-Qaap (ugly but at least computers will know we're talking about a script)

- tok-x-sitelen-pona (using the bcp 47 private use area)

- tok-Blis (close enough)

</musi> ~.hecko (talk) 20:27, 30 November 2023 (UTC)