Talk:plorcly borglar: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Latest revision as of 22:08, 24 April 2024

tp wiki formatting[edit | edit source]

Latest comment: 7 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion

It's not really in toki pona, so I'm not sure if the tp template should apply in general for plocly borglar stuff - and more importantly I have the impression the title shouldn't be indicated as tok either? Jan Ke Tami (talk) 23:52, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Seems closer to being in Toki Pona than in English, which is what it would fall back to otherwise.

A third option could be to invent a subcode like tok-plorcly, but it's not like Pig Latin is tagged as a separate language from English. And then more subcodes would have to be standardized for everything under Writing systems, and probably several other obfuscations of Toki Pona. (…Maybe tok-sp would be good for UCSUR sitelen pona, but that's another discussion.) Menasewi (talk) 18:15, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

<musi>

iso script tags are a) always 4-letter b) very lacking in the private use department (only Qaaa-Qabx)

so since there's no sp code it'd have to be either

- tok-Qaap (ugly but at least computers will know we're talking about a script)

- tok-x-sitelen-pona (using the bcp 47 private use area)

- tok-Blis (close enough)

</musi> ~.hecko (talk) 20:27, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == tp wiki formatting ==
 It's not ''really'' in toki pona, so I'm not sure if the tp template should apply in general for plocly borglar stuff - and more importantly I have the impression the title shouldn't be indicated as tok either? [[User:Jan Ke Tami|Jan Ke Tami]] ([[User talk:Jan Ke Tami|talk]]) 23:52, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
 :Seems closer to being in Toki Pona than in English, which is what it would fall back to otherwise.
 :A third option could be to invent a subcode like <code>tok-plorcly</code>, but it's not like Pig Latin is tagged as a separate language from English. And then more subcodes would have to be standardized for everything under [[Writing systems]], and probably several other obfuscations of Toki Pona. (&hellip;Maybe <code>tok-sp</code> would be good for UCSUR {{tp|sitelen pona}}, but that's another discussion.) [[User:Menasewi|Menasewi]] ([[User talk:Menasewi|talk]]) 18:15, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
+::&lt;{{tok|musi}}&gt;
+::[[w:ISO 15924|iso script tags]] are a) always 4-letter b) very lacking in the private use department (only <code>Qaaa</code>-<code>Qabx</code>)
+::so since there's no sp code it'd have to be either
+::- <code>tok-Qaap</code> (ugly but at least computers will know we're talking about a script)
+::- <code>tok-x-sitelen-pona</code> (using the [[w:IETF language tag#Syntax of language tags|bcp 47 private use area]])
+::- <code>tok-Blis</code> ([[w:Blissymbolics|close enough]])
+::&lt;/{{tok|musi}}&gt; ~[[User:.hecko|.hecko]] ([[User talk:.hecko|talk]]) 20:27, 30 November 2023 (UTC)