Talk:plorcly borglar: Difference between revisions

From sona pona, the Toki Pona wiki
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Menasewi in topic tp wiki formatting
Content added Content deleted
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== tp wiki formatting ==
== tp wiki formatting ==
{{Talk}}

It's not ''really'' in toki pona, so I'm not sure if the tp template should apply in general for plocly borglar stuff - and more importantly I have the impression the title shouldn't be indicated as tok either? [[User:Jan Ke Tami|Jan Ke Tami]] ([[User talk:Jan Ke Tami|talk]]) 23:52, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
It's not ''really'' in toki pona, so I'm not sure if the tp template should apply in general for plocly borglar stuff - and more importantly I have the impression the title shouldn't be indicated as tok either? [[User:Jan Ke Tami|Jan Ke Tami]] ([[User talk:Jan Ke Tami|talk]]) 23:52, 21 October 2023 (UTC)



Revision as of 07:17, 24 November 2023

tp wiki formatting

This discussion is unresolved. Please reply to help reach a consensus or address the topic. Remove this template when resolved. (See all)

It's not really in toki pona, so I'm not sure if the tp template should apply in general for plocly borglar stuff - and more importantly I have the impression the title shouldn't be indicated as tok either? Jan Ke Tami (talk) 23:52, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Seems closer to being in Toki Pona than in English, which is what it would fall back to otherwise.
A third option could be to invent a subcode like tok-plorcly, but it's not like Pig Latin is tagged as a separate language from English. And then more subcodes would have to be standardized for everything under Writing systems, and probably several other obfuscations of Toki Pona. (…Maybe tok-sp would be good for UCSUR sitelen pona, but that's another discussion.) Menasewi (talk) 18:15, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]