User talk:SnpoSuwan/aAANUSEMEmailMahjong: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 03:40, 23 March 2024

Page should be deleted for non-notability

Latest comment: 3 months ago5 comments3 people in discussion

This discussion is unresolved. Please reply to help reach a consensus or address the topic. Remove this template when resolved. (See all)

This is an in-joke that barely continued to exist by the time I joined the community, and is persisted only among the handful of people from that time that are still involved in the community. It never existed as a word in Toki Pona by any metric other than the bare minimum of somebody claiming to have coined it as a word in Toki Pona. It does not meet any reasonable standard of notability and should not be part of the wiki. Gregdan3 (talk) 04:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

sounds good to me, maybe move to ma pona pi toki pona ~.hecko (talk) 17:47, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@.hecko hi i think i mentioned this In that thread but shouldn't the wiki work be done On the wiki

anyway i'm still recommending this page for deletion Gregdan3 (talk) 00:11, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

continuing to recommend this page for deletion; the stated reasoning has not changed and will not change no matter what level of detail is included on the page Gregdan3 (talk) 18:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Since this discussion started, jan Lepeka has added aAANUSEMEmailMahjong to sitelen seli kiwen and Fairfax, making this issue a bit more complicated. As stated at SP:N, inclusion in a font is arguably enough reason to include a word on the wiki, because people who find it in the font will ask questions about what the word is, and it's better that they find it on our wiki with more nuanced info and disclaimers than in most other places.

That said,

a) That doesn't mean that it needs to have its own article. We can move it to another article, as .hecko suggested.

b) Unlike many other joke words, there isn't really a danger of people starting to use aAANUSEMEmailMahjong as a serious Toki Pona word, because it's very obviously not a real word (unlike e.g. jonke). So the common argument for including it may not apply here.

— jan Pensa (talk)

03:40, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 ::anyway i'm still recommending this page for deletion [[User:Gregdan3|Gregdan3]] ([[User talk:Gregdan3|talk]]) 00:11, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 :::continuing to recommend this page for deletion; the stated reasoning has not changed and will not change no matter what level of detail is included on the page  [[User:Gregdan3|Gregdan3]] ([[User talk:Gregdan3|talk]]) 18:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
+::::Since this discussion started, jan Lepeka has added <code>aAANUSEMEmailMahjong</code> to {{tp|[[sitelen seli kiwen]]}} and [[Fairfax]], making this issue a bit more complicated. As stated at [[SP:N]], inclusion in a font is arguably enough reason to include a word on the wiki, because people who find it in the font will ask questions about what the word is, and it's better that they find it on our wiki with more nuanced info and disclaimers than in most other places.
+::::That said,
+::::a) That doesn't mean that it needs to have its own article. We can move it to another article, as .hecko suggested.
+::::b) Unlike many other joke words, there isn't really a danger of people starting to use aAANUSEMEmailMahjong as a serious Toki Pona word, because it's very obviously not a real word (unlike e.g. {{tp|[[jonke]]}}). So the common argument for including it may not apply here.
+::::— [[User:jan Pensa|jan Pensa]] ([[User talk:jan Pensa|talk]]) [[File:Sitelen seli kiwen - Pensa.png|x24px]] 03:40, 23 March 2024 (UTC)