pali: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{nimi |
{{nimi |
||
| image = Blacksmith working 3.jpg |
| image = Blacksmith working 3.jpg |
||
| alt = A blacksmith working |
| alt = A blacksmith working |
||
| PoS = content word |
| PoS = content word |
||
}} |
}} |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
=== |
===Semantic drift from "do" sense=== |
||
{{Needs work|1=Not sure how to call the "X li Y e Z" = "X makes Z Y" construction. Apart from that, do other communities outside of ma pona do this? When did people *start* doing it?|2=section}} |
|||
{{Anchor|palin't}} |
{{Anchor|palin't}} |
||
[[ |
In [[historical usage]] and in the book {{pu|en}}, the word {{tp|pali}} was often used as a generic action verb meaning "to do". This has since become notably less popular, an instance of {{w|semantic drift}}. This drift is sometimes referred to as {{tp|pali}}n't.<ref name="palint">{{cite web|url=https://mun.la/sona/palint|title=palin't|author={{tok|[[jan Kekan San]]}}|website=mun.la|publisher=|access-date=2024-01-21}}</ref> |
||
{{Example |
{{Example |
||
|sina pali e seme? |
|sina <mark>pali</mark> e seme? |
||
|What are you doing? (''obsolete usage'')<br |
|What are you doing? (''obsolete usage'')<br |
||
/>What are you working on? (''surviving usage'')<ref name="palint" /> |
/>What are you working on? (''surviving usage'')<ref name="palint" /> |
||
|sina pali e seme |
|sina <mark>pali </mark> e seme |
||
}} |
}} |
||
Many speakers |
Many speakers nowadays prefer more direct constructions with a causative predicate construction, in the form ''X {{tp|li}} Y {{tp|e}} Z''. |
||
{{Example |
{{Example |
||
|ona li pali e ni: mi pona. |
|ona li <mark>pali</mark> e ni: mi pona. |
||
|They do this: I am good. (''obsolete usage'') |
|They do this: I am good. (''obsolete usage'') |
||
|ona li pali e ni2 {{idsp}} mi pona |
|ona li <mark>pali </mark> e ni2 {{idsp}} mi pona |
||
}} |
}} |
||