pali: Difference between revisions

113 bytes removed ,  27 days ago
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1:
{{nimi
| image = Blacksmith working 3.jpg
| alt = A blacksmith working
| PoS = content word
}}
Line 19:
}}
 
===DriftSemantic drift from "do" sense===
{{Needs work|1=Not sure how to call the "X li Y e Z" = "X makes Z Y" construction. Apart from that, do other communities outside of ma pona do this? When did people *start* doing it?|2=section}}
{{Anchor|palin't}}
In [[Historicalhistorical usage]]ly and in the book {{lipu pu|en}}, the word {{tp|pali}} was often used as a generic action verb meaning "to do". This has since become notably less popular, an instance of {{w|semantic drift}}. This drift is sometimes referred to as {{tp|pali}}n't.<ref name="palint">{{cite web|url=https://mun.la/sona/palint|title=palin't|author={{tok|[[jan Kekan San]]}}|website=mun.la|publisher=|access-date=2024-01-21}}</ref> This drift is sometimes referred to as '''{{tp|pali}}n't'''.
 
{{Example
|sina <mark>pali</mark> e seme?
|What are you doing? (''obsolete usage'')<br
/>What are you working on? (''surviving usage'')<ref name="palint" />
|sina <mark>pali </mark> e seme
}}
 
Many speakers nownowadays prefer more direct constructions with a causative predicate.{{citation needed}}construction, Thisin maythe haveform motivated''X the{{tp|li}} Y {{tp|e}} changeZ''.
 
{{Example
|ona li <mark>pali</mark> e ni: mi pona.
|They do this: I am good. (''obsolete usage'')
|ona li <mark>pali </mark> e ni2 {{idsp}} mi pona
}}