sona pona:Notability: Difference between revisions

From sona pona, the Toki Pona wiki
Content added Content deleted
(minor elaboration (I was confused for a second what it would mean for a list to not have a coherent style, heh))
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Wiki essay}}
{{Wiki essay}}
{{Shortcut|SP:N}}
{{Shortcut|SP:N}}
'''Notability''' is a measure of whether a topic warrants its own article, or mention on the wiki in general.
'''Notability''' is a measure of whether a topic warrants its own article, or mention on the wiki in general. Since Toki Pona is a niche topic in itself, the notability standards for {{tp|sona pona}} are more permissive than {{w|Project:Notability|those for Wikipedia}}; topics are judged by their relevance to the language or [[community]] culture.


Because [[Toki Pona]] is a niche topic in itself, {{tp|[[sona pona]]}}'s notability standards are more permissive than {{w|Project:Notability|Wikipedia's}}; topics are judged by their relevance to the language or [[community]] culture. Still, editors have varying opinions on what the wiki should include. {{w|Deletionist}}s are often concerned with learners absorbing [[word]]s and [[style]]s that are not used or understood in practice, by which {{tp|sona pona}} would artificially influence the language rather than covering it responsibly. Inclusionists have argued that within Toki Pona, presence in a [[learning resource]] or [[font]] may amount to notability, and {{tp|sona pona}} coverage could provide better usage disclaimers, nuance, and citations than other resources.
Editors have varying opinions on what the wiki should include. {{w|Deletionist}}s are often concerned with learners absorbing [[word]]s and [[styles of speech]] that are not widely used or understood in practice, by which {{tp|sona pona}} would artificially influence the language rather than covering it responsibly. {{w|Inclusionist}}s have argued that within Toki Pona, presence in a [[learning resource]] or [[font]] may amount to notability, and {{tp|sona pona}} coverage could provide better usage disclaimers, nuance, and citations than other resources.


Current standards include:
Current standards include:
*Additions to existing systems require a higher level of notability than new systems.
* Additions to existing systems require a higher level of notability than new systems.
*Articles should not give {{w|Project:Undue weight|undue weight}} to significantly less notable topics. For example, see {{sect|Project:Word articles#Related words}}.
* Articles should not give {{w|Project:Undue weight|undue weight}} to significantly less notable topics. For example, see {{sect|Project:Word articles#Related words}}.
*A list may warrant its own article, even if not all of its items do, and even if the list does not form a coherent style of Toki Pona usage.
* A list may warrant its own article, even if not all of its items do, and even if the list does not form a coherent style of Toki Pona usage.
*[[mw:Help:User page|User pages]] are not subject to notability requirements.
* [[mw:Help:User page|User pages]] are not subject to notability requirements.
{{Project}}
{{Project}}

Revision as of 13:20, 8 March 2024

Essay: This is a wiki essay with advice from one or more contributors.
Shortcut: SP:N

Notability is a measure of whether a topic warrants its own article, or mention on the wiki in general. Since Toki Pona is a niche topic in itself, the notability standards for sona pona are more permissive than those for Wikipedia; topics are judged by their relevance to the language or community culture.

Editors have varying opinions on what the wiki should include. Deletionists are often concerned with learners absorbing words and styles of speech that are not widely used or understood in practice, by which sona pona would artificially influence the language rather than covering it responsibly. Inclusionists have argued that within Toki Pona, presence in a learning resource or font may amount to notability, and sona pona coverage could provide better usage disclaimers, nuance, and citations than other resources.

Current standards include:

  • Additions to existing systems require a higher level of notability than new systems.
  • Articles should not give undue weight to significantly less notable topics. For example, see Project:Word articles § Related words.
  • A list may warrant its own article, even if not all of its items do, and even if the list does not form a coherent style of Toki Pona usage.
  • User pages are not subject to notability requirements.