Jump to content

Radicals in sitelen pona: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(→‎Table of radicals: added non-pu glyph)
No edit summary
Line 4:
The radical-based analysis was invented{{citation needed|date=2024-01-16|reason=where? by whom?}} after the initial set of glyphs was published in ''[[Toki Pona: The Language of Good]]''. Some of these elements were clearly intended, such as the ''emitters'' initially representing {{tp|[[pana]]}}-like concepts, the triangle shape representing [[color]]s, and the incorporation of {{tp|[[luka]]}} (the ''hand radical'') representing manual actions. Other proposed radicals may be coincidental or questionably meaningful, such as acknowledgments of shared glyph "etymologies". For example, markers of non-{{w|Declarative sentence|declarative}} sentences have been analyzed as having a ''punctuation stem radical'', but perhaps it is more direct to say that these glyphs are each based on Latin punctuation.
 
The term is taken from {{w|Radical (Chinese characters)|radicals}} of {{w|Chinese character}}s, which dictionaries use to sort words. This comparison has been disputed. While there have been attempts to sortgroup {{tp|sitelen pona}} glyphs by common features, there is no such <em>standard</em> sorting[[Collation orderof sitelen pona|collation]], and glyphs are most often sorted alphabetically by the words' {{tp|[[sitelen Lasina]]}} spellings. Radicals are more often used for shape-based [[input method]]s, comparable to {{w|Cangjie input method|Cangjie}}. In addition, not every {{tp|sitelen pona}} glyph is considered to contain a radical, and some have multiple that are considered with equal or unclear priority.
 
==History==
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.