Jump to content

sona pona:Notability: Difference between revisions

Added two examples back
mNo edit summary
(Added two examples back)
Line 21:
On the one hand, these glyphs should not be given undue weight. On the other, readers may already be disproportionately familiar with them from font repertoires, dictionaries (such as {{tok|[[Linku]]}}), and even personal experimentation with fonts. They could easily assume that such a glyph is in common usage, and that the wiki article is merely incomplete if the glyph is absent.
 
The current consensus is that these sorts of nonstandard and proposed glyphs may be included, but: they should not be described as "the" glyph for a certain word. As such, they should not show up in the infobox. (This may happen automatically; an in-template solution is to be developed.)
* They should not be described as "{{wikt|the}}" glyph for a certain word.
* As such, they should not show up in the infobox. (This may happen automatically; an in-template solution is to be developed.)
 
HereBelow is an example {{tp|sitelen pona}} section for a [[historical]]glyph word.with For other cases, the first sentence cana benonstandard tweaked.glyph:
 
<syntaxhighlight lang="html+handlebars">
==={{tp|sitelen pona}}===
A proposed {{tp|[[sitelen pona]]}} glyph for {{tp|{{subst:PAGENAME}}}} is depicts/represents/is derived from/is composed of <!--…--> in order that it could be used in the writing system. This was proposed by <!--whom?--> in <!--when?-->. In practice, it is unknown whether the glyph sees significant use.
</syntaxhighlight>
 
Another example for a [[historical]] word. For other cases, the first sentence can be tweaked.
 
<syntaxhighlight lang="html+handlebars">
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.