351
edits
kepeken e: Difference between revisions
Push coining of transitive prepositional phrases back to 2017. Cite jan Pensa's commit message, which is admittedly a piece of mise en abîme I wasn't expecting to reach.
No edit summary |
(Push coining of transitive prepositional phrases back to 2017. Cite jan Pensa's commit message, which is admittedly a piece of mise en abîme I wasn't expecting to reach.) |
||
Line 1:
{{tp title}}
{{Needs work|formatting}}
'''{{tp|kepeken e}}''' is the site of contention in a debate about toki pona grammar. It is a "corner case" whose interpretation is uncertain: everyone agrees that it is ''possible'' to follow the [[preposition]] [[kepeken]] with the [[transitivizing]] [[particle]] [[e]], but it is not clear what such a construction means, nor whether it should be used.
== Transitivity ==
Recall that toki pona [[verbs]] take a [[direct object]] introduced by the [[particle]] [[e]]. It is expected that the reader understand this point before they attempt what follows.
| |||