Discuss mi li and sina li
Add topicLatest comment: 5 months ago by JPeton in topic Why no li?
Merge with li[edit | edit source]
I think this is worth merging with li: it simply describes a way in which this particle is used. JPeton (talk) 15:54, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Why no li?[edit | edit source]
Cause two (that it focuses on mi and sina less than on other subjects) feels highly speculative and like an a posteriori justification. As far as I know, the only substantiated reason that there is no li after mi and sina is etymological. JPeton (talk) 15:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC)