Discuss mi li and sina li

Revision as of 07:14, 24 November 2023 by Menasewi (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Latest comment: 6 months ago by JPeton in topic Why no li?

Merge with li Edit

I think this is worth merging with li: it simply describes a way in which this particle is used. JPeton (talk) 15:54, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why no li? Edit

This discussion is unresolved. Please reply to help reach a consensus or address the topic. Remove this template when resolved. (See all)

Cause two (that it focuses on mi and sina less than on other subjects) feels highly speculative and like an a posteriori justification. As far as I know, the only substantiated reason that there is no li after mi and sina is etymological. JPeton (talk) 15:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Return to "mi li and sina li" page.