Talk:mi li and sina li: Difference between revisions
Add topicLatest comment: 7 months ago by JPeton in topic Why no li?
Content added Content deleted
(→Merge with li: new section) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think this is worth merging with [[li]]: it simply describes a way in which this particle is used. [[User:JPeton|JPeton]] ([[User talk:JPeton|talk]]) 15:54, 9 November 2023 (UTC) |
I think this is worth merging with [[li]]: it simply describes a way in which this particle is used. [[User:JPeton|JPeton]] ([[User talk:JPeton|talk]]) 15:54, 9 November 2023 (UTC) |
||
== Why no [[li]]? == |
|||
{{Talk}} |
|||
Cause two (that it focuses on [[mi]] and [[sina]] less than on other subjects) feels highly speculative and like an a posteriori justification. As far as I know, the only substantiated reason that there is no [[li]] after [[mi]] and [[sina]] is etymological. [[User:JPeton|JPeton]] ([[User talk:JPeton|talk]]) 15:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 07:14, 24 November 2023
Merge with li[edit | edit source]
I think this is worth merging with li: it simply describes a way in which this particle is used. JPeton (talk) 15:54, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Why no li?[edit | edit source]
Cause two (that it focuses on mi and sina less than on other subjects) feels highly speculative and like an a posteriori justification. As far as I know, the only substantiated reason that there is no li after mi and sina is etymological. JPeton (talk) 15:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC)