Minimalism: Difference between revisions

From sona pona, the Toki Pona wiki
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Hatnote|Not to be confused with [[Minimal pairs]].}}
[[Toki Pona]]'s simplicity is often described as '''minimalism''', including in official material. This makes some learners sensitive to perceived inefficiencies, like the color and animal words that could be replaced by other words and phrases. However, Toki Pona is not strictly minimalist.
The simplicity of [[Toki Pona]] is often described as '''minimalism''', including in [[Official Toki Pona|official material]]. This makes some learners sensitive to perceived inefficiencies, such as the [[color]] and [[animal word]]s that could theoretically have been replaced by other words and [[phrase]]s. However, Toki Pona is not strictly minimalist.


== Problems with minimalism ==
==Problems with minimalism==
Toki Pona tries to be natural and focus on universals of the human experience, whereas conlangs that are engineered for minimalism often feel unnatural to use. Natural languages develop basic color words for light, dark, red, yellow, and {{w|Blue–green distinction in language|grue}}, so Toki Pona has {{tp|walo}}, {{tp|pimeja}}, {{tp|loje}}, {{tp|jelo}}, and {{tp|laso}}. It is natural for {{tp|uta}} to be separate from {{tp|lupa}}; after all, the mouth is seen and used constantly for many things like breathing, eating, gesture, speech, and art.
Toki Pona tries to be natural and focus on universals of the human experience, whereas conlangs that are engineered for minimalism often feel unnatural to use. Natural languages develop basic color words for light, dark, red, yellow, and {{w|Blue–green distinction in language|grue}}, so Toki Pona has {{tp|walo}}, {{tp|pimeja}}, {{tp|loje}}, {{tp|jelo}}, and {{tp|laso}}. It is natural for {{tp|uta}} to be separate from {{tp|lupa}}; after all, the mouth is seen and used constantly for many things like breathing, eating, gesture, speech, and art.


Redundancy is a failsafe, and such "inefficiency" can be a strength in language.<ref>K. Klein (26 August 2022). [https://youtube/watch?v=3B_uGsgXKdk "What People Get Wrong About Language - The Ithkuil Fallacy"]. ''YouTube''.</ref> You could design a conlang with shorter words that still follows Toki Pona's simple phonotactics. But if taken too far, this would make it easier to miss words entirely, and it would create more [[Minimal pairs|sets of words that are confusingly similar]].
Redundancy is a failsafe, and such "inefficiency" can be a strength in language.<ref>K. Klein (26 August 2022). [https://youtube/watch?v=3B_uGsgXKdk "What People Get Wrong About Language - The Ithkuil Fallacy"]. ''YouTube''.</ref> You could design a conlang with shorter words that still follows Toki Pona's simple phonotactics. But if taken too far, this would make it easier to miss words entirely, and it would create more [[Minimal pairs|sets of words that are confusingly similar]].


Replacing words with set phrases would also be a form of [[lexicalization]]. For example, replacing the word {{tp|jelo}} with {{tp|kule suno}} (as suggested by the {{tp|[[sitelen pona]]}} glyph {{spt|jelo}}) would make it difficult to refer to the color of any light that isn't yellow.
Replacing words with set phrases would also be a form of [[lexicalization]]. For example, replacing the word {{tp|jelo}} with {{tp|kule suno}} (as suggested by the {{tp|[[sitelen pona]]}} glyph {{sp|jelo}}) would make it difficult to refer to the color of any light that isn't yellow.


==Goals of simplicity==
==Goals of simplicity==
As the name suggests, Toki Pona is built around the concept of {{tp|[[pona]]}}. It is only simple to the extent that its simplicity is {{tp|pona}}. The separate animal words encourage discussing different kinds of animals, which can be therapeutic. Similarly, the word {{tp|[[mu]]}} exists apart from {{tp|kalama soweli}} because using an onomatopoeia is joyful.
As the name suggests, Toki Pona is built around the concept of {{tp|[[pona]]}}. It is only simple to the extent that its simplicity is {{tp|pona}}. The separate animal words encourage discussing different kinds of animals, which can be therapeutic. Similarly, the word {{tp|[[mu]]}} exists apart from {{tp|kalama soweli}} because using an onomatopoeia is joyful.


{{nasin pu}}
The philosophy of Toki Pona's simplicity is discussed in {{pu|en}}. Simplifying complicated ideas provides new insights and "points to the centre of things". Contradictions obscured by specialized words and cultural baggage are exposed; "bad friend" might be translated as the oxymoron {{tp|jan pona ike}}, or using a phrase without {{tp|pona}} in the first place, revealing one's feelings about such a friend. These benefits do not require absolute minimalism, only sufficient simplicity.
The [[philosophy]] of Toki Pona's simplicity is discussed in {{pu|en}}. Simplifying complicated ideas provides new insights and "points to the centre of things". Contradictions obscured by specialized words and cultural baggage are exposed; "bad friend" might be translated as the oxymoron {{tp|jan pona ike}}, or using a phrase without {{tp|pona}} in the first place, revealing one's feelings about such a friend. These [[benefit]]s do not require absolute minimalism, only sufficient simplicity.


The language's simplicity aims for a happy medium where things are not overcomplicated, but not too limited for speech, understanding, or fun.
The language's simplicity aims for a happy medium where things are not overcomplicated, but not too limited for speech, understanding, or fun.
Line 18: Line 20:
<references />
<references />
{{General}}
{{General}}
[[Category:Essays]]

Latest revision as of 08:01, 6 April 2024

The simplicity of Toki Pona is often described as minimalism, including in official material. This makes some learners sensitive to perceived inefficiencies, such as the color and animal words that could theoretically have been replaced by other words and phrases. However, Toki Pona is not strictly minimalist.

Problems with minimalism[edit | edit source]

Toki Pona tries to be natural and focus on universals of the human experience, whereas conlangs that are engineered for minimalism often feel unnatural to use. Natural languages develop basic color words for light, dark, red, yellow, and grue, so Toki Pona has walo, pimeja, loje, jelo, and laso. It is natural for uta to be separate from lupa; after all, the mouth is seen and used constantly for many things like breathing, eating, gesture, speech, and art.

Redundancy is a failsafe, and such "inefficiency" can be a strength in language.[1] You could design a conlang with shorter words that still follows Toki Pona's simple phonotactics. But if taken too far, this would make it easier to miss words entirely, and it would create more sets of words that are confusingly similar.

Replacing words with set phrases would also be a form of lexicalization. For example, replacing the word jelo with kule suno (as suggested by the sitelen pona glyph jelo) would make it difficult to refer to the color of any light that isn't yellow.

Goals of simplicity[edit | edit source]

As the name suggests, Toki Pona is built around the concept of pona. It is only simple to the extent that its simplicity is pona. The separate animal words encourage discussing different kinds of animals, which can be therapeutic. Similarly, the word mu exists apart from kalama soweli because using an onomatopoeia is joyful.

This subject or style relates to Toki Pona: The Language of Good.

The philosophy of Toki Pona's simplicity is discussed in Toki Pona: The Language of Good. Simplifying complicated ideas provides new insights and "points to the centre of things". Contradictions obscured by specialized words and cultural baggage are exposed; "bad friend" might be translated as the oxymoron jan pona ike, or using a phrase without pona in the first place, revealing one's feelings about such a friend. These benefits do not require absolute minimalism, only sufficient simplicity.

The language's simplicity aims for a happy medium where things are not overcomplicated, but not too limited for speech, understanding, or fun.

References[edit | edit source]