ki: Difference between revisions
(→Function: pona e linja pakala) Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|PoS=particle |
|PoS=particle |
||
}} |
}} |
||
'''{{tp|ki}}''' is {{a category}} [[post-pu|post-{{tp|pu}}]] [[particle]] that marks a relative [[clause]]. It is |
'''{{tp|ki}}''' is {{a category}} [[post-pu|post-{{tp|pu}}]] [[particle]] that marks a relative [[clause]]. It is almost never used due to its implications for [[Toki Pona]] [[grammar]], making sentences much more complex. |
||
==Etymology== |
==Etymology== |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Function== |
==Function== |
||
{{Needs work| |
|||
*Can you drop the subject of the relative clause? If so, then as an alternative, describe how {{tp|A <del>ki</del> B li C}} expresses roughly the same thing as {{tp|A <ins>li</ins> B li C}}, or at least {{tp|A li B la ona li C}}. |
|||
*What is its priority relative to other particles? |
|||
**In {{tp|A ki B li C li D li E}}, how many of the {{tp|li}} belong to the {{tp|ki}} clause? The <strong>clause</strong> {{tp|B li C}} must be, at least, because just the <strong>phrase</strong> {{tp|ki B}} would be {{tp|pi B}}, but is there any rule for the rest, such as the second or final {{tp|li}} ending the {{tp|ki}} clause? Or is this just guessed, or supposed to be marked only with prosody or punctuation? Or can {{tp|li}} not be used within {{tp|ki}} after all, forcing the subject to be dropped as above? |
|||
**Likewise with {{tp|A li B ki C e D e E}}, which {{tp|e}} ends the {{tp|ki}} clause? Or can {{tp|ki}} not be used in this position? Or is it unclear? |
|||
|section}} |
|||
{{tp|ki}} acts like a {{wp|relative pronoun}}, similar to English "which", "who", or "that". |
{{tp|ki}} acts like a {{wp|relative pronoun}}, similar to English "which", "who", or "that". |
||
| Line 22: | Line 16: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
Many details about how ki works have never been decided on, since it is almost never used in practice. |
|||
Ambiguity may arise with more complex sentences, e.g. "{{tp|jan ki moku kili li tawa li pona}}" could mean either "the man who eats fruit moves and is good" or "the man who eats fruit and moves is good".{{citation needed}} This ambiguity is avoided in {{tp|sitelen pona}}, as the scope is marked with an underline connected to the glyph (see [[#sitelen pona|#{{tp|sitelen pona}}]]). |
|||
==Alternatives== |
==Alternatives== |
||
Revision as of 02:29, 22 June 2024
| Pronunciation | /ki/ |
|---|---|
| Usage | 2023: Obscure (2% → ) Most speakers don't understand this word.2022: Obscure (2%)
|
| Book and era | No book (post-pu) |
| Part of speech | Particle |
ki is an obscure post-pu particle that marks a relative clause. It is almost never used due to its implications for Toki Pona grammar, making sentences much more complex.
Etymology
The word ki is derived from French qui, meaning "who". It was coined by akesi kon Nalasuni and jan Atenaja in 2020.
Function
ki acts like a relative pronoun, similar to English "which", "who", or "that".
jan ki moku e kilijan ki moku e kili
the man who eats fruit
Many details about how ki works have never been decided on, since it is almost never used in practice.
Alternatives
In standard Toki Pona, ni ("that") can be used to refer to the upcoming sentence, causing it to function similarly to a relative clause.
sitelen pona
A proposed sitelen pona glyph for ki (ki) is derived from that of pi and functions the same way, but the left side is in the shape of a left-facing angle bracket, resembling a flipped li (li) connected to the low line. It was designed by nimi Elemenopi in January 2021.[1]
References
- ↑ nimi Elemenopi [u/ElemenopiTheSequel]. (29 January 2021). "Updated 1b glyphs". r/OffThePu. Reddit. Retrieved 28 December 2023. "[Key: black] = original, made by me".
Further reading
- "ki" on lipu Linku